BVerwG 10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)•Revision allowed on standard of judicial conviction in deportation protection
BVerwG 10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)Bverwg / Division 10Jun 23, 2010Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against the refusal to admit revision in an immigration case concerning deportation protection. It held that the matter has fundamental significance because it can clarify the standards for judicial conviction when § 60(7) sentences 1 and 3 AufenthG are applied in conformity with the Constitution. The revision was therefore admitted.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental importance in deportation-protection cases: Fundamental importance exists where the intended revision may clarify the requirements for judicial conviction under constitutionally conforming application of § 60(7) sentences 1 and 3 AufenthG. The question whether and to what extent the fact-finder must be convinced of a concrete danger in such cases can justify admission of the revision when its resolution is capable of contributing to the development and uniform application of law (cf. consid. 2).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-06-23
Aktenzeichen: 10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 60 Abs 7 S 1 AufenthG 2004, § 60 Abs 7 S 3 AufenthG 2004, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 108 Abs 1 S 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 16. Juni 2009, Az: 11 S 979/06, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 10. Senat
Abschiebungsschutz; konkrete und allgemeine Gefahr; verfassungskonforme Auslegung; richterliche Überzeugungsbildung; Revisionszulassung
1 Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.
2 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die richterliche Überzeugungsbildung in Fällen verfassungskonformer Anwendung von § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 und 3 AufenthG zu stellen sind.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the revision should be admitted because the case has fundamental importance under § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO.
Yes. The complaint is admissible and well-founded; the revision is to be admitted.
The case may clarify what requirements apply to judicial conviction when § 60(7) sentences 1 and 3 AufenthG are applied in a constitutionally conforming manner.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.