projects

Exclusion of compensation benefits; revision admitted

BVerwG 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10)Bverwg / Division 5Jun 30, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and admitted the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance, namely the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG. The court thus enabled further clarification of that provision in the revision proceedings. The underlying dispute concerned compensation benefits, but the order addressed only the admissibility of revision, not the merits.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132(2) No. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance; a complaint is well-founded where the case is capable of clarifying the reach of a statutory exclusion ground. Fundamental importance exists when a legal question of general significance requires further doctrinal clarification in revision. Here, the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG warranted such clarification (consid. 1-2).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-06-30

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 3 Nr 1 AusglLeistG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Dresden, 4. August 2009, Az: 7 K 2230/06, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Ausschluss von Ausgleichsleistungen

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Reichweite des Ausschlussgrundes in § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG geben.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental importancecompensation benefitsexclusion groundadministrative procedure

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint was admissible and well-founded; the revision was admitted because the case could clarify the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG.

Extracted reasoning

The legal question concerning the reach of the exclusion provision was considered to have fundamental significance and to warrant further clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.