BVerwG 2 B 102/09, 2 B 102/09 (2 C 28/10)•Duty to investigate in administrative proceedings
BVerwG 2 B 102/09, 2 B 102/09 (2 C 28/10)Bverwg / Division 2Jun 23, 2010Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court held that the complaint was well-founded. It found that the revision proceedings were suitable to clarify the requirements of the court's duty to investigate under § 86(1) VwGO. The excerpt does not contain further details on the underlying dispute or the full dispositive part.
§ 86 Abs. 1 VwGO; duty of the court to investigate ex officio in administrative proceedings; a complaint against non-admission of revision is well-founded where the case raises a legal question that is suitable for clarification in revision. The admissibility of revision may be justified when the extent of the judicial duty to investigate requires further doctrinal clarification (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-06-23
Aktenzeichen: 2 B 102/09, 2 B 102/09 (2 C 28/10)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 86 Abs 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 23. Juli 2009, Az: 1 A 2084/07, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Aufklärungspflicht im Verwaltungsprozess
1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, die Anforderungen an die gerichtliche Aufklärungspflicht im Verwaltungsprozess näher zu klären.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the complaint should be upheld because the revision proceedings could clarify the court's duty to investigate.
Yes. The complaint was well-founded because the revision proceedings were suitable for clarifying the requirements of the judicial duty to investigate in administrative proceedings.
The court considered the legal question sufficiently open and suitable for clarification in revision proceedings.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.