projects

Invitation to interview for severely disabled applicants

BVerwG 5 B 58/09, 5 B 58/09 (5 C 15/10)Bverwg / Division 5May 26, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted revision against a Baden-Württemberg administrative appellate judgment in a dispute over the interview invitation obligations toward a severely disabled equivalent applicant. The court held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the interpretation of § 82 sentences 2 and 3 SGB IX and § 22 AGG when an applicant is not invited because of exam grades.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance in relation to § 82 sentences 2 and 3 SGB IX and § 22 AGG; a case may warrant revision where clarification is needed as to whether, and under what conditions, a severely disabled equivalent applicant may be excluded from an interview on the basis of examination grades. The decisive point is the need for abstract clarification of the interaction between the employer’s interview obligation and the evidentiary rule of § 22 AGG (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 58/09, 5 B 58/09 (5 C 15/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-05-26

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 58/09, 5 B 58/09 (5 C 15/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 82 S 2 SGB 9, § 82 S 3 SGB 9, § 22 AGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 4. August 2009, Az: 9 S 3330/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Bewerbung schwerbehinderter Menschen; Vorstellungsgespräch; fachliche Eignung

Gründe

1 Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 4. August 2009 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann Gelegenheit zur Klärung geben, wie § 82 Satz 2 und 3 SGB IX sowie § 22 AGG auszulegen sind, wenn eine einem Schwerbehinderten gleichgestellte Bewerberin mit Blick auf ihre Examensnoten nicht zu einem Vorstellungsgespräch eingeladen wird.

Keywords

severe disabilityjob applicationinterview invitationfundamental importanceequality lawburden of proof

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance regarding the interpretation of § 82 sentence 2 and 3 SGB IX and § 22 AGG in the context of not inviting a severely disabled equivalent applicant to an interview due to exam grades.

Extracted holding

Revision is to be admitted because the case can clarify how those provisions apply in this hiring context.

Extracted reasoning

The court found that the legal questions raised are of fundamental importance and require clarification in revision proceedings.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.