projects

Revision admitted on disciplinary sanction criteria

BVerwG 2 B 1/10, 2 B 1/10 (2 C 13/10)Bverwg / Division 2Mar 10, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision in a disciplinary matter concerning the proper measure for possession of child pornography. It held that the case could clarify which criteria govern the assessment of the required disciplinary sanction.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO i.V.m. § 69 BDG; admission of revision for clarification of disciplinary sanction criteria: Revision is to be admitted where the intended decision promises clarification of the criteria for determining the appropriate disciplinary measure in a service offence consisting of possession of child pornography punishable under § 184b Abs. 4 sentence 2 StGB.

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 1/10, 2 B 1/10 (2 C 13/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-03-10

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 1/10, 2 B 1/10 (2 C 13/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 13 BDG, § 184b Abs 4 S 2 StGB

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes, 29. September 2009, Az: 7 A 323/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Bemessung der Disziplinarmaßnahme; Besitz kinderpornographischer Schriften

Gründe

1 Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO i.V.m. § 69 BDG zuzulassen. Die angestrebte Entscheidung erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, nach welchen Bemessungskriterien die erforderliche Disziplinarmaßnahme für das Dienstvergehen des Besitzes kinderpornographischer Schriften, strafbar gemäß § 184b Abs. 4 Satz 2 StGB, zu bestimmen ist.

Keywords

disciplinary sanctionrevision admissibilitychild pornographyservice offencesanction criteria

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted to clarify the criteria for determining the proper disciplinary sanction for possession of child pornography.

Extracted holding

Revision admitted because the question is suitable for clarifying the relevant sentencing criteria.

Extracted reasoning

The Court considered the issue worthy of clarification under § 132(2)(1) VwGO in conjunction with § 69 BDG, since it concerns the assessment criteria for the necessary disciplinary measure in a service offence involving possession of child pornography punishable under § 184b(4) sentence 2 StGB.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.