projects

BVG revision admissible on pension crediting of training time

BVerwG 2 B 12/09, 2 B 12/09 (2 C 4/10)Bverwg / Division 2Jan 20, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision in a dispute over whether training time may be credited toward pension rights under § 12(1) sentence 1 BeamtVG. It held that the case raises a legally significant question about the effect of Art. 46b(2) of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 on the exercise of administrative discretion. The prior judgment of the Bavarian Administrative Court was therefore not finally reviewed on the merits at this stage.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility and fundamental importance where the case concerns the interaction between EU social security coordination law and discretionary pension crediting under § 12 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BeamtVG. A revision is to be admitted if the answer to the legal question is capable of clarifying whether and to what extent Art. 46b Abs. 2 of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 constrains the administrative discretion governing the recognition of training periods for civil-service pension purposes (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 12/09, 2 B 12/09 (2 C 4/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-20

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 12/09, 2 B 12/09 (2 C 4/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: Art 46b Abs 2 EWGV 1408/71, § 12 Abs 1 S 1 BeamtVG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 9. Oktober 2008, Az: 3 BV 07.3490, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Ruhegehalt; Berücksichtigung der Ausbildungszeit

Gründe

1 Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Die angestrebte Entscheidung erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, welche Bedeutung Art. 46b Abs. 2 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1408/71 für die Ausübung des durch § 12 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BeamtVG eröffneten Ermessens hat.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental importancepension creditingtraining timediscretioncivil service pensionEU social security coordination

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance regarding the significance of Art. 46b(2) of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 for the discretion under § 12(1) sentence 1 BeamtVG.

Extracted holding

Revision is admitted because clarification is needed on how Art. 46b(2) of Regulation (EEC) No. 1408/71 affects the exercise of discretion under § 12(1) sentence 1 BeamtVG.

Extracted reasoning

The proposed decision may contribute to clarifying the legal significance of Art. 46b(2) for the discretionary decision on recognizing training periods for pension purposes.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.