BVerwG 1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17)•Revision admitted; when removal is deemed executable
BVerwG 1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17)Bverwg / Division 1Mar 27, 2017Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal in an asylum case. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning when it is established under Section 34a(1) sentence 1 AsylVfG 1992 that removal can be carried out, and what legal consequences arise if that condition is not met.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance. Revision is to be admitted where the case offers an occasion to clarify an unresolved question of law of general significance. In the context of § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylVfG 1992, this includes the requirements for the determination that removal can be carried out and the legal consequences if such determination cannot yet be made (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-27
Aktenzeichen: 1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:270317B1B23.17.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 34a Abs 1 S 1 AsylVfG 1992, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 21. Dezember 2016, Az: A 11 S 342/16, Urteilvorgehend VG Karlsruhe, 18. Dezember 2015, Az: A 2 K 176/14
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat
Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzung für das Feststehen der Abschiebungsdurchführbarkeit
1 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen, weil sie dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Fragen geben kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen im Sinne des § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG "feststeht", dass eine Abschiebung durchgeführt werden kann, und welche Rechtsfolgen sich ergeben, wenn dies nicht der Fall ist
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for reasons of fundamental importance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.
Revision was admitted because the case could clarify when it is established within the meaning of Section 34a(1) sentence 1 AsylVfG 1992 that a removal can be carried out, and what legal consequences follow if that is not established.
The question is of fundamental importance and requires further clarification by the Senate.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.