projects

Leave to appeal on mixed permanent and holiday residence in special area

BVerwG 4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17)Bverwg / Division 4Feb 28, 2017Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint and allowed the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: whether a special area under § 11(1) BauNVO may validly be designated for a combination of permanent residence and holiday residence. The court also noted that the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings was to be set under the GKG provisions cited in the decision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for fundamental importance; a complaint is well founded where the case is capable of clarifying a legally fundamental question. A revision may be admitted if the appeal proceedings are likely to resolve an unresolved issue of general significance. This is the case here with respect to whether § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO permits the designation of a special area combining permanent residence and holiday residence (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-02-28

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:280217B4BN35.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 11 Abs 1 BauNVO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OVG Lüneburg, 9. August 2016, Az: 1 KN 65/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen im Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO

Gründe

1 Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob eine Kombination von Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen in einem Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO festgesetzt werden kann.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental importancespecial areaholiday housingpermanent housingplanning law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be granted for fundamental importance regarding the permissibility of combining permanent residence and holiday residence in a special area under § 11(1) BauNVO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint was successful because the proposed revision could clarify a legally fundamental question.

Extracted reasoning

The court found that the case raised a question of fundamental significance: whether a special area under § 11(1) BauNVO may be designated to combine permanent living and holiday living. This could be clarified in revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.