projects

Revision admitted on inclusion of existing structures under § 34 BauGB

BVerwG 4 B 47/16, 4 B 47/16 (4 C 9/16)Bverwg / Division 4Dec 15, 2016Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision in a planning-law case. It held that the proceedings could clarify which existing buildings must be taken into account when assessing whether a project fits into the surrounding area under § 34(1) sentence 1 BauGB. The court also provisionally fixed the dispute value for the revision proceedings under the court fees statute.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a revision complaint in connection with § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB: A revision is to be admitted where the proceedings are likely to clarify which existing structural installations are to be included in the assessment of whether a project fits into the character of the surrounding area. The question is one of general significance if its answer is relevant for determining the built-up area to be considered in the locality. Dispute value for the revision proceedings is to be provisionally fixed according to the applicable court-fee provisions (consid. 1 f.).

Full text

BVerwG — 4 B 47/16, 4 B 47/16 (4 C 9/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-12-15

Aktenzeichen: 4 B 47/16, 4 B 47/16 (4 C 9/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:151216B4B47.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 34 Abs 1 S 1 BauGB

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 1. August 2016, Az: 7 A 937/14, Beschlussvorgehend VG Köln, 26. März 2014, Az: 23 K 6172/12

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Sich-Einfügen im Sinne von § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB; Einbeziehung vorhandener baulicher Anlage

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage beitragen, welche vorhandenen baulichen Anlagen in die Betrachtung einzubeziehen sind, um zu entscheiden, ob sich ein Vorhaben nach der überbaubaren Grundstücksfläche im Sinne von § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB in die Eigenart der näheren Umgebung einfügt.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

revision admissionfundamental importancebuilding lawintegration into surroundingsbuilt-up areadispute value

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO because a question of fundamental importance arises as to which existing buildings must be considered when assessing integration under § 34(1) sentence 1 BauGB.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the proposed proceedings could clarify which existing structural installations are to be included in determining whether a project fits into the character of the surrounding area.

Extracted reasoning

The question is capable of general clarification and is relevant to the legal assessment of the permissible built-up area under § 34(1) sentence 1 BauGB.

Key legal question

Provisional value of the dispute for the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The court fixed the provisional amount for the revision proceedings on the basis of the court fees statute.

Extracted reasoning

The value determination follows the statutory rules on court costs and dispute value.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.