projects

Revision allowed on remuneration of procedural representative

BVerwG 9 B 62/15, 9 B 62/15 (9 C 12/16)Bverwg / Division 9Jul 21, 2016Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and allowed the revision under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO. The court considered the case to raise a question of fundamental importance because the standard for remunerating a procedural representative under § 119(3) FlurbG had not yet been clarified. It also made a provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for fundamental importance in relation to remuneration of a procedural representative under § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG. A revision is to be admitted where the appeal raises a question of law of fundamental importance that has not yet been clarified by the Federal Administrative Court and whose clarification can be expected in the revision proceedings. The court may admit the revision in order to determine the legal benchmark for calculating remuneration under § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 9 B 62/15, 9 B 62/15 (9 C 12/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-07-21

Aktenzeichen: 9 B 62/15, 9 B 62/15 (9 C 12/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:210716B9B62.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 119 Abs 3 FlurbG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg, 25. Juni 2015, Az: OVG 70 A 13.12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Vergütung des Verfahrensvertreters nach § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, über den vom Bundesverwaltungsgericht bisher nicht geklärten Maßstab für die Vergütung des Verfahrensvertreters gemäß § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG zu entscheiden.

2 Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

revision admissionfundamental importanceprocedural representativeremunerationland consolidationamount in dispute

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint was admissible and well-founded; the revision was admitted because the case raises a previously unresolved standard for remuneration of the procedural representative under § 119(3) FlurbG.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Administrative Court held that the case could provide an opportunity to clarify the benchmark for determining the representative’s remuneration, which had not yet been settled by the court.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.