projects

Revision allowed on limitation of reimbursement claim

BVerwG 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16)Bverwg / Division 10Apr 26, 2016Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint seeking leave to appeal. It held that the case raises an unresolved question of fundamental importance: whether a reimbursement claim under § 49a(1) VwVfG in conjunction with Rhineland-Palatinate administrative procedure law is subject to limitation and, if so, under what conditions limitation occurs. The Court emphasized that the question has not yet been clarified in its case law and is relevant in many cases.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal for fundamental importance; a complaint is successful where it identifies an unresolved, revisable legal question capable of clarification in revision and of relevance beyond the individual case. The contested question whether a reimbursement claim under § 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG in conjunction with § 1 LVwVfG RP is subject to limitation, and what requirements govern the commencement or occurrence of limitation, was previously unsettled in the case law of the Federal Administrative Court and therefore warranted revision (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-04-26

Aktenzeichen: 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:260416B10B2.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 49a Abs 1 VwVfG, § 1 VwVfG RP

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 17. November 2015, Az: 6 A 10633/15, Urteilvorgehend VG Koblenz, 8. Dezember 2014, Az: 3 K 1066/13.KO

Spruchkörper: 10. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Verjährung eines Erstattungsanspruchs (§ 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG i.V.m. § 1 VwVfG RP)

Gründe

1 Die auf die grundsätzliche Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) gestützte Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage geben, ob der Erstattungsanspruch nach § 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG i.V.m. § 1 LVwVfG RP, der gemäß § 137 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 VwGO dem revisiblen Recht angehört, der Verjährung unterliegt und von welchen Voraussetzungen der Eintritt der Verjährung abhängt. Diese für eine Vielzahl von Fällen bedeutsame Rechtsfrage ist in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts bislang nicht geklärt.

Keywords

revision leavefundamental importancelimitationreimbursement claimadministrative procedure law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the complaint established a ground for leave to appeal based on the fundamental importance of the case.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint could lead to clarification of a legal question of fundamental importance.

Extracted reasoning

The legal question whether the reimbursement claim under § 49a(1) VwVfG in conjunction with § 1 LVwVfG RP is subject to limitation, and under what conditions limitation occurs, had not yet been clarified in the Federal Administrative Court's case law and is important for many cases.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.