projects

Admission of revision in company land consolidation

BVerwG 9 B 1/16, 9 B 1/16 (9 C 4/16)Bverwg / Division 9Mar 10, 2016Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the claimant's complaint against the denial of leave to appeal in a company land consolidation dispute. It held that the case has fundamental importance because it may further develop the case law on how far the land consolidation authority may review the prerequisites for initiating a company land consolidation procedure upon request of the expropriation authority under § 87(1) FlurbG. The court also noted the provisional assessment of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental importance in company land consolidation proceedings under § 87 Abs. 1 FlurbG. A question is of fundamental importance when the proposed revision can clarify or develop the case law on a legally relevant and unresolved issue of general significance. This may be the case where the scope of the land consolidation authority's power of review upon initiation of a company land consolidation procedure at the request of the expropriation authority is disputed (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 9 B 1/16, 9 B 1/16 (9 C 4/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-03-10

Aktenzeichen: 9 B 1/16, 9 B 1/16 (9 C 4/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:100316B9B1.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 87 Abs 1 FlurbG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OVG Lüneburg, 20. Oktober 2015, Az: 15 KF 25/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Prüfungsbefugnis im Unternehmensflurbereinigungsverfahren

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Rechtsprechung zum Umfang der Prüfungsbefugnis der Flurbereinigungsbehörde bei Einleitung eines Unternehmensflurbereinigungsverfahrens auf Antrag der Enteignungsbehörde (§ 87 Abs. 1 FlurbG) fortzuentwickeln.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz GKG.

Keywords

revisionfundamental importancecompany land consolidationscope of reviewnon-admission complaint

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the complaint against denial of leave to appeal on a question of fundamental importance is well-founded.

Extracted holding

Yes. The case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the scope of review by the land consolidation authority when initiating a company land consolidation procedure at the request of the expropriation authority.

Extracted reasoning

The court considered the matter capable of advancing case law on the extent of the authority's review powers under § 87(1) FlurbG.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.