projects

Revision admissible on 'customary' nature under BAföG

BVerwG 5 B 45/15, 5 B 45/15 (5 C 54/15)Bverwg / Division 5Nov 2, 2015Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the claimant's complaint against non-admission of revision. It held that the case has fundamental significance because the interpretation of § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG, especially the meaning of the 'customary' nature of services, warrants clarification in revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental significance: a legal question is of fundamental importance where the revision court is called upon to clarify an unresolved and generally relevant issue of statutory interpretation. This applies here to the meaning of the criterion of 'customary' services in § 48 Abs. 1 sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG, which requires abstract clarification beyond the individual case (consid. 1-2).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 45/15, 5 B 45/15 (5 C 54/15), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-11-02

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 45/15, 5 B 45/15 (5 C 54/15)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:021115B5B45.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 48 Abs 1 S 1 Nr 2 BAföG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 1. April 2015, Az: 4 Bf 205/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Hamburg, 11. September 2012, Az: 2 K 576/12

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; "Üblichkeit" der Leistungen im Sinne von § 48 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 BAföG

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, rechtsgrundsätzliche Fragen der Auslegung des § 48 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 BAföG in Bezug auf das Merkmal der "Üblichkeit" der Leistungen zu klären.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental significanceBAföGcustomary naturestatutory interpretation

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental significance concerning the interpretation of 'customary' services under § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG.

Extracted holding

Yes. The case raises a question of fundamental importance because the meaning of 'customary' in § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG requires clarification in revision proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

The complaint was admissible and well-founded. The proposed revision can clarify a legal question of general significance regarding the interpretation of § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG, specifically the criterion of customary nature of services.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.