projects

Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust remedies

BVerfG 1 BvR 1166/09Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. KammerMar 24, 2010Inadmissible

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. It held that the complaint was inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted the available administrative judicial remedies against the City B. certification dated 2004-04-20. The Court therefore abstained from giving any further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust remedies. A constitutional complaint is inadmissible where the complainant has not first pursued the available ordinary legal remedies, here the administrative court remedy against a municipal certification issued under the Investitionszulagengesetz 1999. The subsidiarity requirement applies irrespective of the merits of the asserted constitutional objections. If the prerequisite of exhaustion is missing, the Court may decline to admit the complaint without further reasoning.

Full text

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1166/09, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-03-24

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1166/09

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100324.1bvr116609

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 3a Abs 1 S 1 InvZulG 1999 vom 11.06.2001

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 18. Februar 2009, Az: III S 48/08, Beschlussvorgehend BFH, 27. Juni 2008, Az: III S 152/08, Beschlussvorgehend Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 8. Juni 2007, Az: 1 K 675/06, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

Tenor

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie mangels Ausschöpfung des verwaltungsgerichtlichen Rechtsweges gegen die Bescheinigung der Stadt B. vom 20. April 2004 gemäß § 6 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Alternative 2 des Investitionszulagengesetzes 1999 unzulässig ist.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Gründe

1 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Keywords

constitutional complaintinadmissibilityexhaustion of remediessubsidiaritymunicipal certificationinvestments allowance

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite failure to exhaust the administrative remedy against the city certification of 2004.

Extracted holding

The complaint was not admitted because the complainant had not exhausted the administrative judicial remedy against the certification issued by the City B. on 2004-04-20.

Extracted reasoning

Under the subsidiarity principle, a constitutional complaint is inadmissible if the available prior legal remedies have not been pursued; the Court therefore declined to decide the complaint further.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.