BVerfG 1 BvR 986/17•BVerfG: abusive recusal motion rejected in original composition
BVerfG 1 BvR 986/17Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. KammerJul 24, 2017Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court, 1st Senate, 3rd Chamber, held that the recusal motion directed against Vice President Kirchhof and other chamber judges was abusive and therefore inadmissible. It decided in its original composition and, under Section 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG, dispensed with further reasons. The constitutional complaint itself was not accepted for decision. The decision is final.
§ 19 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG; § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG: An obviously abusive motion to recuse a constitutional judge is inadmissible and may be dismissed in the original chamber composition, including the judge challenged by the motion, without prior substitution. In proceedings on the non-acceptance of a constitutional complaint, the Chamber may refrain from providing further reasons if the requirements of Section 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG are met.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-07-24
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 986/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170724.1bvr098617
Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss
Normen: § 19 Abs 1 BVerfGG, § 19 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG, § 90 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend AG Plön, 10. Juni 2016, Az: 11 XVII 2421, Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne weitere Begründung - Zurückweisung eines rechtsmissbräuchlichen Ablehnungsgesuchs in ursprünglicher Besetzung
Die Anträge auf Ablehnung des Vizepräsidenten Kirchhof und "anderer" Richter der Kammer werden als unzulässig verworfen.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
1 Die Kammer entscheidet unter Mitwirkung des Vizepräsidenten Kirchhof und ihrer weiteren Mitglieder. Das gegen sie angebrachte Ablehnungsgesuch ist rechtsmissbräuchlich.
2 Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the recusal motions against Vice President Kirchhof and other chamber judges were admissible
The motions were inadmissible because they were abusive.
The chamber found the request for disqualification to be rechtsmissbräuchlich and therefore refused to consider it further.
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision
The constitutional complaint was not accepted for decision.
The chamber gave no further reasons pursuant to Section 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.