projects

Non-admission for failure to exhaust legal remedies

BVerfG 2 BvR 1312/12Bverfg / 2. Senat 2. KammerFeb 23, 2015Inadmissible

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Constitutional Court did not admit the complainant’s constitutional complaint. It held that the complaint was inadmissible because the complainant had failed to exhaust legal remedies properly. In particular, an Anhörungsrüge would, from an objective perspective, have been capable of correcting the alleged fundamental-rights violation. The decision is final.

Omnilex headnote

§ 90 Abs. 2 S. 1 BVerfGG; admissibility of a constitutional complaint despite omitted Anhörungsrüge: Legal remedies are not exhausted if an available Anhörungsrüge could, on objective assessment, have led to correction of the alleged violation. Exhaustion requires use of such a remedy before filing the constitutional complaint; the omission renders the complaint inadmissible (cf. BVerfGE 134, 106 <115>).

Full text

BVerfG — 2 BvR 1312/12, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-02-23

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 1312/12

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150223.2bvr131212

Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss

Normen: § 90 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend LG Cottbus, 27. April 2012, Az: 7 T 100/10, Beschlussvorgehend AG Cottbus, 13. April 2010, Az: 19 XIV 8/09, Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Mangelnde Rechtswegerschöpfung bei unterlassener Anhörungsrüge

Tenor

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, da sie unzulässig ist. Die Beschwerdeführerin hat den Rechtsweg nicht ordnungsgemäß erschöpft (vgl. § 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG), da die Erhebung einer Anhörungsrüge bei objektiver Betrachtung zur Korrektur des gerügten Grundrechtsverstoßes hätte führen können (vgl. BVerfGE 134, 106 <115>).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Gründe

1 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Keywords

constitutional complaintexhaustion of remediesAnhörungsrügeinadmissibilityfinality

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite failure to file an Anhörungsrüge

Extracted holding

The complaint was inadmissible because legal remedies had not been properly exhausted; an Anhörungsrüge could objectively have remedied the alleged rights violation.

Extracted reasoning

Under § 90(2) sentence 1 BVerfGG, exhaustion requires using an available remedy if, objectively assessed, it may lead to correction of the alleged fundamental-rights violation. That was the case here.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.