BVerfG 1 BvR 1933/08•Non-admission of constitutional complaint; parallel decision
BVerfG 1 BvR 1933/08Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. KammerDec 21, 2011Inadmissible
Extracted by Omnilex
The First Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. It referred to its reasoning in the parallel case 1 BvR 1932/08 and, pursuant to § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG, provided no further reasons. The decision is final and not subject to appeal.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber decision. Where the Chamber relies on the reasons stated in a parallel decision and sees no need for further explanation, it may dispense with additional reasoning. The non-admission leaves the challenged lower-court judgments in place and is not subject to appeal.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-12-21
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1933/08
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rk20111221.1bvr193308
Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 2. April 2008, Az: 6 C 17/07, Urteilvorgehend VG Köln, 1. März 2007, Az: 1 K 3928/06, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
1 Zur Begründung wird auf die im vorliegenden Verfahren ebenfalls Geltung beanspruchenden Ausführungen im Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 8. Dezember 2011 im Verfahren 1 BvR 1932/08 (www.bverfg.de) verwiesen.
2 Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision
The complaint was not accepted; the Court referred to the reasons stated in its parallel decision and gave no further reasoning.
The Chamber incorporated by reference the reasoning from the parallel case and, under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG, dispensed with further reasons.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.