BVerfG 1 BvR 234/14•Non-admission of license revocation for mixed alcohol and cannabis use
BVerfG 1 BvR 234/14Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. KammerJul 3, 2014Inadmissible
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber, did not admit the constitutional complaint against the revocation of a driving licence following mixed alcohol and cannabis use. The complaint was rejected without reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. The challenged judgments of the Administrative Court Regensburg and the Federal Administrative Court remained untouched.
§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint without reasons. A chamber may refuse to admit a constitutional complaint by unanalyzed order if the statutory admission requirements are not met. In such a case, the Court need not set out substantive constitutional review of the underlying administrative-court judgments; the non-admission order leaves the lower-court decisions in force. The decision is procedural and does not contain a merits assessment of the contested measure.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-07-03
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 234/14
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 11 FeV 2010, § 3 Abs 1 S 1 StVG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 14. November 2013, Az: 3 C 32/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Regensburg, 17. Dezember 2010, Az: RO 8 K 10.476, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer
Nichtannahme ohne Begründung: Fahrerlaubnisentziehung bei Mischkonsum von Alkohol und Cannabis
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision despite the challenged revocation of the driving licence.
The complaint was not admitted for decision.
The chamber issued a non-admission order without reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.