Scope of restitution exclusion for reform and reparations measures

BVerfG 2 BvR 1511/11Bverfg / 2. Senat 2. KammerNov 19, 2013Inadmissible

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Constitutional Court, 2nd Chamber of the 2nd Senate, issued a non-reasoned chamber order on a constitutional complaint challenging Dresden court decisions on restitution exclusion for Boden- und Industriereform and reparations measures. The complaint was not accepted for decision. No substantive constitutional review was provided in the order.

Omnilex headnote

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber order without reasons. A chamber may decline to accept a constitutional complaint for decision without setting out reasons. Such a non-admission order contains no substantive constitutional determination and leaves the challenged lower-court decisions untouched.

Full text

BVerfG — 2 BvR 1511/11, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-11-19

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 1511/11

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: Art 143 Abs 3 GG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, Nr 1 RegGErkl/EinigVtr, § 1 Abs 5 StrRehaG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OLG Dresden, 8. Juni 2011, Az: 1 Reha Ws 98/09, Beschlussvorgehend OLG Dresden, 26. November 2010, Az: 1 Reha Ws 98/09, Beschlussvorgehend LG Dresden, 24. August 2009, Az: BSRH 22/06, Beschlussnachgehend Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 9. Juni 2016, Az: 44164/14, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Reichweite des Restitutionsausschlusses für Maßnahmen der Boden- und Industriereform sowie für Reparationsmaßnahmen zwischen 1945 und 1949

Keywords

constitutional complaintnon-admissionrestitution exclusionreparationsreunification lawBoden reformindustrial reform

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible and should be admitted for decision.

Extracted holding

The complaint was not accepted for decision.

Extracted reasoning

The chamber issued a summary non-admission order without reasons; the available record indicates no further examination on the merits.

Key legal question

Whether the challenged decisions concerning restitution exclusion under the reunification and rehabilitation rules violated constitutional rights.

Extracted holding

No merits decision was rendered in this chamber order.

Extracted reasoning

Because the complaint was not accepted, the court did not issue a substantive constitutional assessment.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.