Non-admission of constitutional complaint in NSU trial order case

BVerfG 1 BvR 1007/13Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. KammerApr 12, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Constitutional Court's chamber did not admit a constitutional complaint challenging security orders made by the presiding judge in the NSU trial. It held the complaint to be manifestly unfounded and found no evident violation of fundamental rights. The court dispensed with reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. As a consequence, the pending request for interim relief was also erledigt. The decision is final and not subject to appeal.

Omnilex headnote

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint as manifestly unfounded; summary chamber decision without reasons. A chamber may refrain from stating reasons where the constitutional complaint is obviously without merit and no violation of fundamental rights is discernible. If the main application is not admitted, an accompanying application for interim relief is rendered moot. Such a non-admission decision is final and non-appealable.

Full text

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1007/13, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-04-12

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1007/13

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:rk20130412.1bvr100713

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 176 GVG

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Sicherungsverfügungen des Vorsitzenden im "NSU-Prozess"

Tenor

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Sie ist offensichtlich unbegründet, da Grundrechte des Beschwerdeführers erkennbar nicht verletzt sind.

Damit erledigt sich zugleich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

Gründe

1 Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

2 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Keywords

constitutional complaintnon-admissionmanifestly unfoundedinterim relieffundamental rightstrial ordersummary procedure

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint should be admitted for decision.

Extracted holding

The complaint was not admitted because it was manifestly unfounded and no evident violation of the complainant's fundamental rights was found.

Extracted reasoning

The chamber abstained from giving reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Key legal question

Whether interim relief should be granted.

Extracted holding

The application for an interim injunction became moot once the constitutional complaint was not admitted.

Extracted reasoning

The dismissal of the complaint disposed of the request for interim relief.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.