Key legal question
Whether the prior interim order concerning participation in a paternity test should be repeated for another six months or until the constitutional complaint is decided.
Extracted holding
The interim order was repeated again because, on the balance of consequences, the disadvantages of conducting the test and later prevailing on the merits—especially disruption or destruction of the social-family relationship—outweighed the disadvantages of postponing the test.
Extracted reasoning
The Court relied on the balancing required under Section 32 BVerfGG and considered the potential irreversible harm to the social-family bond if the examination were carried out before the constitutional complaint was resolved.