BVerfG 1 BvR 1234/11•Constitutional complaint not accepted; parallel decision
BVerfG 1 BvR 1234/11Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. KammerJun 6, 2012Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court, First Chamber of the First Senate, did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. It relied on a parallel chamber decision of 29 May 2012 and expressly dispensed with further reasoning under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. The complaint therefore failed at the admissibility/acceptance stage; the decision is unappealable.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; non-acceptance of a constitutional complaint without further reasons. Where a chamber does not accept a constitutional complaint for decision and refers to a parallel decision, it may abstain from any further reasoning pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG. The non-acceptance disposition is final and not subject to appeal.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-06-06
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1234/11
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120606.1bvr123411
Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 16. September 2010, Az: V R 46/09, Urteilvorgehend FG Münster, 13. August 2009, Az: 5 K 3432/07 U, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai 2012 - 1 BvR 640/11).
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision
The complaint was not accepted for decision.
The Chamber saw no need for further reasoning and referred to a parallel decision of 29 May 2012.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.