BVerfG 1 BvR 1395/11•Constitutional complaint not accepted for decision
BVerfG 1 BvR 1395/11Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. KammerMay 29, 2012Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. It referred to a parallel order of the same date and dispensed with further reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. The order is final and not subject to appeal.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; non-acceptance of a constitutional complaint; the Court may decline to provide further reasons where the complaint is not accepted for decision. In such cases, the complaint is terminated without substantive elaboration; a reference to a parallel decision of the same date is permissible. The order is final and non-appealable.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-29
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1395/11
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr139511
Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 31. März 2011, Az: V S 4/11, Beschlussvorgehend BFH, 16. September 2010, Az: V R 48/09, Urteilvorgehend FG Münster, 13. August 2009, Az: 5 K 2784/07 U, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai 2012 - 1 BvR 640/11 -).
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision
The constitutional complaint was not accepted for decision.
The Court gave no further reasoning and referred to its parallel order of the same date; it also dispensed with further reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.