Repeat interim order suspending enforcement of paternity testing

BVerfG 1 BvR 2509/10Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. KammerSep 7, 2011Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In constitutional complaint proceedings concerning paternity determination, the Federal Constitutional Court repeated its earlier interim order. The order, originally issued on 2010-10-07 and extended on 2011-03-16, continues for another six months, but no longer than until the main constitutional complaint is decided. The practical effect is continued provisional protection against enforcement of the examination measures.

Omnilex headnote

§ 32 Abs. 6 S. 2 BVerfGG; repetition of an interim order in constitutional complaint proceedings. Where the reasons for provisional relief persist, the Federal Constitutional Court may renew a previously issued interim order for a limited period. The renewed order may be tied to the pendency of the main proceedings and serves to preserve the status quo until the constitutional complaint is resolved (consid. not specified).

Full text

BVerfG — 1 BvR 2509/10, Einstweilige Anordnung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-09-07

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 2509/10

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rk20110907.1bvr250910

Dokumenttyp: Einstweilige Anordnung

Normen: Art 6 Abs 2 S 1 GG, §§ 1600ff BGB, § 1592 Nr 2 BGB, § 1600 Abs 1 Nr 5 BGB, § 1600 Abs 3 BGB, § 32 Abs 6 S 2 BVerfGG, § 372a Abs 1 ZPO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OLG Hamm, 25. August 2010, Az: 12 UF 129/10, Beschlussvorgehend AG Gelsenkirchen, 2. Juni 2010, Az: 24 F 484/09, Zwischenbeschlussvorgehend BVerfG, 7. Oktober 2010, Az: 1 BvR 2509/10, Einstweilige Anordnungvorgehend BVerfG, 16. März 2011, Az: 1 BvR 2509/10, Einstweilige Anordnung

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Erneute Wiederholung einer eA: Aussetzung der Vollziehung, Untersuchungen im Rahmen eines Vaterschaftsfeststellungsverfahrens zu dulden

Tenor

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 7. Oktober 2010, verlängert mit Beschluss vom 16. März 2011, wird für die Dauer von weiteren sechs Monaten, längstens bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, wiederholt.

Keywords

interim reliefpaternity determinationgenetic examinationstatus quoconstitutional complaintfamily law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the previous interim order suspending enforcement and protecting the complainant from paternity-examination measures should be extended.

Extracted holding

The interim order of 2010-10-07, as extended on 2011-03-16, is repeated for a further six months, at most until the constitutional complaint is decided.

Extracted reasoning

The Court maintained the provisional protection already granted in the constitutional complaint proceedings; the order remains necessary for the time being.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.