Taxation of employer VBL contribution as wages

BVerfG 2 BvR 3056/09Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. KammerJul 27, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The First Chamber of the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. The complaint concerned a BFH judgment holding that an employer's contribution to the VBL constitutes taxable wages at the time of payment. The published decision contains no reasons beyond the citation to § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-acceptance of a constitutional complaint without reasons. A chamber may reject acceptance by unanonymized order without stating reasons where the statutory requirements for acceptance are not shown. Such a non-entry decision does not contain a substantive review of the challenged judgment and leaves it in force.

Full text

BVerfG — 2 BvR 3056/09, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-27

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 3056/09

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100727.2bvr305609

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 7. Mai 2009, Az: VI R 8/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Umlagezahlung des Arbeitgebers an die Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder (VBL) als steuerpflichtiger Arbeitslohn im Zeitpunkt der Zahlung

Keywords

constitutional complaintnon-entrytaxable wagesemployer contributionpublic pension fund

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint was to be admitted for decision.

Extracted holding

The complaint was not accepted for decision.

Extracted reasoning

The chamber decided under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG without a reasoned decision; no admissibility or merits review was pursued in the published text.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.