Non-admission of constitutional complaint over teacher ratings online

BVerfG 1 BvR 1750/09Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. KammerAug 16, 2010Inadmissible

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The First Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision in a case concerning the online publication of teacher ratings. The court dispensed with a statement of reasons pursuant to § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. The decision is final and unappealable.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint without reasons in chamber proceedings. Where a constitutional complaint is not accepted for decision, the Court may abstain from providing reasons. The decision is not subject to appeal. No substantive constitutional review is conducted in the operative part of such a non-admission order.

Full text

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1750/09, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-08-16

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1750/09

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100816.1bvr175009

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: Art 1 Abs 1 GG, Art 2 Abs 1 GG, § 1004 BGB, § 823 BGB, § 90 Abs 1 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BGH, 23. Juni 2009, Az: VI ZR 196/08, Urteilvorgehend OLG Köln, 3. Juli 2008, Az: 15 U 43/08, Urteilvorgehend LG Köln, 30. Januar 2008, Az: 28 O 319/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Unterlassung der Veröffentlichung von Lehrerbewertungen im Internet - spickmich.de

Tenor

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Gründe

1 Von einer Begründung wird gemäß § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

2 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Keywords

constitutional complaintnon-admissiononline ratingspersonality rightsteacher evaluationsprivacy

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision

Extracted holding

The complaint was not accepted for decision.

Extracted reasoning

The chamber abstained from giving reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.