Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 468/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Regional Labor Court Baden-Württemberg. The court stated that the parties had waived a full statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding. The only operative consequence recorded in the tenor is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may decide the revision without a full factual statement and without detailed reasons. A revision that is not successful is dismissed, with costs following the outcome.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 468/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 468/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR468.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 212/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 10 Sa 59/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 10 Sa 59/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedinglabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the appellate labor judgment was well-founded

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore had to be dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the decision was issued without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties waived them under the cited procedural provisions in light of a parallel case.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.