Revision dismissed; costs borne by claimant

BAG 4 AZR 470/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant’s revision against the judgment of the Land Labour Court Baden-Württemberg. The court issued the decision without stating the facts and reasons, because the parties had waived them in view of a parallel case. The only operative consequence expressly stated in the tenor is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a reasoned judgment. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed at the appellant’s expense; the appellate judgment remains in force.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 470/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 470/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR470.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 217/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 11 Sa 74/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 11 Sa 74/15 - wird auf seine Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonsemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the appellate judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision and referred to the parallel case. The parties had waived statement of facts and reasons under the relevant procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The claimant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the costs followed the outcome of the proceedings.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.