Revision dismissed in labour dispute

BAG 4 AZR 505/15Bag / Division 4Aug 24, 2016Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Labour Court's judgment. The court issued no substantive reasons because the parties had waived findings of fact and the reasons for the decision. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labour Court may render a short-form judgment limited to the operative part. In such a case, the revision is decided without further reasoning in the published text; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision (consid. not indicated).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 505/15, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-08-24

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 505/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:240816.U.4AZR505.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 28. August 2014, Az: 9 Ca 182/14, Teilurteilvorgehend ArbG Kassel, 28. Oktober 2014, Az: 9 Ca 182/14, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 24. Juni 2015, Az: 18 Sa 1486/14, 18 Sa 1581/14, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 24. Juni 2015 - 18 Sa 1486/14 - und - 18 Sa 1581/14 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtRinck
BredendiekDierßen

Keywords

revisionlabour lawcostswaiver of reasonsshort-form judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG judgment was well-founded.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment states only the dispositive outcome; no substantive reasons were provided because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs followed the unsuccessful revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.