Revision dismissed in labour dispute; costs borne by plaintiff

BAG 4 AZR 253/15Bag / Division 4Aug 24, 2016Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Saxony-Anhalt Regional Labour Court. The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them in light of parallel proceedings. The only operative consequence stated is that the plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties, in view of parallel proceedings, waive findings of fact and reasons, the appellate court may decide accordingly without a full statement of reasons. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed at the appellant's cost; the cost consequence follows the usual rule of failure in revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 253/15, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-08-24

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 253/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:240816.U.4AZR253.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Stendal, 11. Juli 2013, Az: 1 Ca 39/13 E, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Sachsen-Anhalt, 17. März 2015, Az: 6 Sa 383/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Sachsen-Anhalt vom 17. März 2015 - 6 Sa 383/13 - wird auf seine Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidungen in den Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 251/15 - und - 4 AZR 255/15 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtRinck
BredendiekDierßen

Keywords

revisionlabour lawcostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision had no success and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court resolved the matter without setting out findings of fact or reasons, referring to the parallel cases and the parties' waiver under the procedural provisions cited in the judgment.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.