Revision dismissed in parallel labor-law case

BAG 4 AZR 256/15Bag / Division 4Aug 24, 2016Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Saxony-Anhalt Regional Labor Court. The case was handled in light of parallel proceedings, and the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The only dispositive consequence stated is that the revision was rejected at the plaintiff's cost.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In revision proceedings, the court may dispense with findings of fact and reasons where the parties so agree in view of parallel proceedings. The judgment need only contain the operative part; a detailed reasoning may be omitted under the statutory prerequisites. Dismissal of the revision entails the usual allocation of costs to the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 256/15, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-08-24

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 256/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:240816.U.4AZR256.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Stendal, 22. Oktober 2013, Az: 3 Ca 36/13 E, Urteilvorgehend ArbG Stendal, 22. Oktober 2013, Az: 3 Ca 1637/12 E, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Sachsen-Anhalt, 17. März 2015, Az: 6 Sa 552/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Sachsen-Anhalt vom 17. März 2015 - 6 Sa 552/13 - wird auf seine Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidungen in den Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 251/15 - und - 4 AZR 255/15 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtRinck
BredendiekDierßen

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingslabor lawwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Regional Labor Court judgment should be upheld

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The decision indicates that, in light of the parallel proceedings, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons; the Federal Labor Court nevertheless rejected the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs follow the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.