Revision dismissed in parallel labour-law case

BAG 4 AZR 367/14Bag / Division 4Jun 15, 2016Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Munich Higher Labour Court judgment and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because the case was connected to parallel proceedings (4 AZR 368/14), so the judgment contains no substantive reasoning on the merits.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in parallel proceedings: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case, the court may render a reasoned judgment-free decision under the statutory exceptions. The waiver does not affect the operative part of the judgment; the revision may be dismissed and costs imposed accordingly.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 367/14, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-15

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 367/14

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:150616.U.4AZR367.14.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG München, 20. Februar 2013, Az: 8 Ca 11416/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 25. Februar 2014, Az: 7 Sa 258/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 25. Februar 2014 - 7 Sa 258/13 - wird auf seine Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 368/14 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtRinck
RupprechtSchuldt

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiverlabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Munich Higher Labour Court judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains no substantive reasons; the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in view of the parallel case 4 AZR 368/14.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.