Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 6 AZR 408/15Bag / Division 6Jun 9, 2016Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court, 6th Senate, dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court. The decision was rendered without a statement of facts or reasons under Section 313a ZPO. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; revision judgment without statement of facts and reasons: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide accordingly; if the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed and the costs of the revision are imposed on the revising party. The abbreviated form of judgment does not require a separate merits discussion in the tenor when the dispositive result is clear from the decision.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 408/15, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-09

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 408/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:090616.U.6AZR408.15.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Lingen, 23. Oktober 2014, Az: 3 Ca 27/14, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 29. Juni 2015, Az: 8 Sa 1550/14, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 29. Juni 2015 - 8 Sa 1550/14 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

| | VRiBAG Dr. Fischermeier ist an der Beifügung seiner Unterschrift verhindert Spelge | | Spelge | | Krumbiegel | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | Wollensak | | C. Klar | | |

Keywords

revisioncostslabour lawsummary judgmentwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the regional labour court judgment had to be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision and upheld the lower court's outcome; the decision was issued without a factual statement or reasons pursuant to Section 313a ZPO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.