Revision granted; employee’s appeal dismissed

BAG 9 AZR 612/14Bag / Division 9Dec 15, 2015Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this employment case, the Federal Labour Court granted the defendant’s revision, set aside the judgment of the Hamburg Higher Labour Court, and dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal against the Hamburg Labour Court’s judgment. The decision also ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings. The excerpt provided contains no factual or substantive reasoning beyond the dispositive part.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; revision and appellate dismissal: where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide by concise judgment; if the revision is successful, the appellate judgment is set aside and the appeal against the first-instance judgment is dismissed, with costs following the outcome.

Full text

BAG — 9 AZR 612/14, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-12-15

Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 612/14

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:151215.U.9AZR612.14.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hamburg, 25. Juli 2013, Az: 23 Ca 3/13, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg, 17. April 2014, Az: 8 Sa 67/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Hamburg vom 17. April 2014 - 8 Sa 67/13 - aufgehoben.

  2. Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Hamburg vom 25. Juli 2013 - 23 Ca 3/13 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  3. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

BrühlerKrasshöferKlose
FrankMerte

Keywords

employment lawrevisionappellate dismissalcostswaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant’s revision should succeed and the appellate judgment be set aside.

Extracted holding

The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside and the plaintiff’s appeal against the first-instance judgment was dismissed.

Key legal question

Allocation of appellate and revision costs.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.