Revision in wage payment case partly successful

BAG 1 AZR 808/13Bag / Division 1May 5, 2015Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In revision proceedings before the Federal Labour Court, the plaintiff succeeded in overturning the appellate judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court and obtaining a modified judgment against the defendant. The defendant was ordered to pay EUR 519.49 gross plus default interest from 5 August 2012. The defendant also had to bear the costs. The judgment states that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons; where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasoning, the judgment may be rendered in shortened form. The operative part alone determines the scope of the decision; appellate correction is limited to the dispositive relief granted. Cost allocation follows the outcome of the proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 1 AZR 808/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-05-05

Aktenzeichen: 1 AZR 808/13

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:050515.U.1AZR808.13.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Nienburg, 22. November 2012, Az: 2 Ca 309/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 5. August 2013, Az: 10 Sa 35/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat

Tenor

Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 5. August 2013 - 10 Sa 35/13 - aufgehoben.

Auf die Berufung des Klägers wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Nienburg vom 22. November 2012 - 2 Ca 309/12 - abgeändert.

Die Beklagte wird verurteilt, an den Kläger 519,49 Euro brutto nebst Zinsen in Höhe von fünf Prozentpunkten über dem Basiszinssatz seit dem 5. August 2012 zu zahlen.

Die Beklagte hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

SchmidtK. SchmidtKoch
RathOlaf Kunz

Keywords

wage paymentrevisioncostsdefault interestshortened judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff was entitled to payment of EUR 519.49 gross plus default interest from 5 August 2012.

Extracted holding

The claim was granted as stated in the operative part.

Extracted reasoning

No reasons were given in the judgment; the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under § 313a(1) ZPO.

Key legal question

How the costs of the litigation were to be allocated.

Extracted holding

The defendant had to bear the costs of the dispute.

Extracted reasoning

Allocated in the operative part together with the success of the revision and appeal.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.