projects

Dismissal of claim after defendant’s successful appeal

BAG 8 AZR 151/14Bag / Division 8Mar 19, 2015Modified

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court upheld defendant 1’s revision, set aside the Munich Higher Labour Court’s judgment, amended the Labour Court’s judgment, and dismissed the action in full. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings and of the intervention. The decision was rendered without detailed findings because the parties had waived the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly dispense with Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe, the court may render a shortened judgment. If the revision is successful, the Federal Labour Court may set aside the appellate judgment, amend the first-instance judgment, and decide the merits by dismissing the claim, while allocating the costs accordingly.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 151/14, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-03-19

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 151/14

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:190315.U.8AZR151.14.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG München, 20. März 2013, Az: 1 Ca 5887/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 21. November 2013, Az: 2 Sa 414/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Auf die Revision der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 21. November 2013 - 2 Sa 414/13 - aufgehoben.

Auf die Berufung der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts München vom 20. März 2013 - 1 Ca 5887/12 - abgeändert und wie folgt neu gefasst:

Die Klage wird insgesamt abgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits und die der Nebenintervention zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBreinlingerWinter
VolzWankel

Keywords

revisiondismissal of claimcostsinterventionwaiver of reasonslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the revision of defendant 1 should lead to reversal of the appellate judgment and dismissal of the claim.

Extracted holding

Yes. The appellate judgment was set aside and the first-instance judgment was amended; the claim was dismissed in full.

Extracted reasoning

The tenor states that the revision of defendant 1 was successful and that the lower-court judgments were changed accordingly. No further reasons are set out because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the dispute and the intervention.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the litigation and the costs of the intervention.

Extracted reasoning

The dispositive part expressly assigns both categories of costs to the claimant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.