BAG 8 AZR 152/14•Employment claim dismissed on revision
BAG 8 AZR 152/14Bag / Division 8Mar 19, 2015Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment dispute, the Federal Labor Court granted the defendant's revision, set aside the Munich Higher Labor Court's judgment, amended the Labor Court's judgment, and finally dismissed the action in full. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the litigation and the intervening party's costs. The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons, because the parties waived them.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons, the court may decide accordingly and confine itself to the dispositive order. On revision, the Federal Labor Court may annul the appellate judgment and, if the case is ready for decision, amend the first-instance judgment and dismiss the action; costs follow the outcome of the proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-03-19
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 152/14
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:190315.U.8AZR152.14.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG München, 20. März 2013, Az: 1 Ca 5888/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 21. November 2013, Az: 2 Sa 415/13, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 21. November 2013 - 2 Sa 415/13 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts München vom 20. März 2013 - 1 Ca 5888/12 - abgeändert und wie folgt neu gefasst:
Die Klage wird insgesamt abgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits und die der Nebenintervention zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Breinlinger | Winter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volz | Wankel |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's claim was well-founded in the revision proceedings
The claim was not well-founded and had to be dismissed in full.
The Federal Labor Court set aside the appellate judgment and, after amending the first-instance judgment, entered a new dispositive order dismissing the action.
What result follows from the defendant's revision and appeal
The appellate judgment was reversed and the first-instance judgment was amended to a full dismissal of the action.
The court granted the defendant's revision, which led to the annulment of the appellate decision and the replacement of the merits ruling.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.