BAG 8 AZR 154/14•Employment claim dismissed on employer’s successful revision
BAG 8 AZR 154/14Bag / Division 8Mar 19, 2015Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment dispute, the Federal Labour Court decided the employer’s revision without a statement of facts or reasons, as the parties had waived them. The Court set aside the judgment of the Munich Regional Labour Court and, by reforming the first-instance judgment of the Munich Labour Court, dismissed the plaintiff’s action in full. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the intervention.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the appellate court may render a judgment in abbreviated form. If the revision is successful, the Federal Labour Court may set aside the appellate judgment and, upon granting the defendant’s appeal, reform the first-instance judgment and dismiss the action in full. Cost allocation follows the tenor and may include both litigation costs and intervenor costs.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-03-19
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 154/14
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:190315.U.8AZR154.14.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG München, 20. März 2013, Az: 1 Ca 5891/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 21. November 2013, Az: 2 Sa 417/13, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 21. November 2013 - 2 Sa 417/13 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts München vom 20. März 2013 - 1 Ca 5891/12 - abgeändert und wie folgt neu gefasst:
Die Klage wird insgesamt abgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits und die der Nebenintervention zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Breinlinger | Winter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volz | Wankel |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the judgment of the Munich Regional Labour Court had to be set aside on revision.
Yes. The Federal Labour Court set aside the appellate judgment.
The dispositive part states that the revision of defendant 1 was successful and the appellate judgment was annulled.
Whether the claim should succeed after the appeal proceedings.
No. The claim was dismissed in its entirety.
The Federal Labour Court reformed the first-instance judgment and expressly held that the action is dismissed in full.
Allocation of litigation costs, including those of the intervenor.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the intervention.
The tenor expressly orders cost allocation against the plaintiff.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.