BAG 3 AZR 905/12•Revision allowed; employment claim dismissed
BAG 3 AZR 905/12Bag / Division 3Jan 13, 2015Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment-law revision case, the Federal Labor Court allowed the defendant's revision, set aside the judgment of the Regional Labor Court Düsseldorf and amended the judgment of the Labor Court Düsseldorf. The claimant's action was dismissed, and the claimant was ordered to bear the costs. The decision notes that the parties waived both the statement of facts and the reasons.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons; where the parties validly dispense with the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment, the court may issue a shortened judgment form. In revision proceedings, if the appellate judgment is erroneous, the Federal Labor Court may set it aside and, upon amendment of the first-instance judgment, dismiss the action. Costs follow the outcome and are imposed on the unsuccessful party.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-01-13
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 905/12
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:130115.U.3AZR905.12.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Düsseldorf, 16. April 2012, Az: 7 Ca 3967/11, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 7. September 2012, Az: 6 Sa 916/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 7. September 2012 - 6 Sa 916/12 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 16. April 2012 - 7 Ca 3967/11 - abgeändert.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Zwanziger | Schlewing | Ahrendt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xaver Aschenbrenner | H. Frehse |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's action should succeed on appeal and revision.
The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside, the first-instance judgment was amended, and the claim was dismissed.
No factual or substantive reasoning is provided in the text excerpt because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.