Pension claim dismissed on defendant’s revision

BAG 3 AZR 370/13Bag / Division 3Jan 13, 2015Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this employment dispute, the defendant succeeded on revision before the Federal Labor Court. The court set aside the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Labor Court, amended the judgment of the Düsseldorf Labor Court, and dismissed the claimant’s action. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them under Section 313a(1) ZPO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of reasons and statement of facts: if the parties validly waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the judgment may be issued in abbreviated form. Where the revision is successful, the appellate judgment is to be set aside and, if the matter is ripe for decision, the court may decide the case itself and dismiss the action. The cost decision follows the final outcome of the litigation.

Full text

BAG — 3 AZR 370/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-01-13

Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 370/13

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:130115.U.3AZR370.13.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Düsseldorf, 26. Juli 2012, Az: 6 Ca 1490/12, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 30. November 2012, Az: 6 Sa 1511/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Tenor

Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 30. November 2012 - 6 Sa 1511/12 - aufgehoben.

Auf die Berufung der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 26. Juli 2012 - 6 Ca 1490/12 - abgeändert.

Die Klage wird abgewiesen.

Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

ZwanzigerSchlewingAhrendt
Xaver AschenbrennerH. Frehse

Keywords

revisioncostsdismissal of claimwaiver of reasonslabor dispute

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant’s revision should succeed against the Düsseldorf Labor Court and Regional Labor Court judgments.

Extracted holding

The revision was successful; both lower-court judgments were set aside and the claim was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains no reasons because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under Section 313a(1) ZPO.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs.

Extracted reasoning

This follows from the dispositive part after the claim was dismissed.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.