Dismissal of claim as inadmissible after revision

BAG 4 AZR 517/12Bag / Division 4Aug 27, 2014Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court allowed the defendant's revision, set aside the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court, and amended the Labour Court Kassel judgment. The claim was dismissed as inadmissible, and the claimant was ordered to bear the costs. The court issued its judgment without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties waived them in light of parallel case 4 AZR 518/12.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the court may issue a shortened judgment without stating the grounds. In the present case, the Federal Labour Court, on revision, set aside the appellate judgment and dismissed the action as inadmissible; the costs follow the outcome of the dispute.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 517/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-08-27

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 517/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 26. Mai 2011, Az: 3 Ca 16/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 2. März 2012, Az: 3 Sa 955/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 2. März 2012 - 3 Sa 955/11 - aufgehoben.

  2. Auf die Berufung des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Kassel vom 26. Mai 2011 - 3 Ca 16/11 - abgeändert:

Die Klage wird als unzulässig abgewiesen.

  1. Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits hat die Klägerin zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung im Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 518/12 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertTreberCreutzfeldt
MayrSteding

Keywords

inadmissibilityrevisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's action was admissible

Extracted holding

The action was inadmissible.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court set aside the appellate judgment and, on the defendant's appeal, amended the first-instance judgment to dismiss the claim as inadmissible.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the proceedings

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs.

Extracted reasoning

As the claim was dismissed, the costs were imposed on the claimant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.