BAG 4 AZR 516/12•Employment claim dismissed as inadmissible on appeal
BAG 4 AZR 516/12Bag / Division 4Aug 27, 2014Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
In an employment dispute, the Federal Labor Court decided the case without a written statement of reasons because the parties had waived findings and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding. On the defendant's revision, the court set aside the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court and amended the first-instance judgment. The claimant's action was dismissed as inadmissible, and the claimant had to bear the costs of the proceedings.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may decide without a full reasoned judgment. If the procedural prerequisites for appellate review are lacking, the action is to be dismissed as inadmissible; upon successful revision, the challenged judgment is set aside and the first-instance decision amended accordingly. Costs follow the outcome.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-08-27
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 516/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 26. Mai 2011, Az: 3 Ca 17/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 2. März 2012, Az: 3 Sa 956/11, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Auf die Revision des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 2. März 2012 - 3 Sa 956/11 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Kassel vom 26. Mai 2011 - 3 Ca 17/11 - abgeändert:
Die Klage wird als unzulässig abgewiesen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung im Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 518/12 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Eylert | Treber | Creutzfeldt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayr | Steding |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's action was admissible in the appellate proceedings
The action was inadmissible.
The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them in view of the parallel case; the appellate court therefore set aside the lower judgment and dismissed the action as inadmissible.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.