BAG 10 AZR 64/14•Revision dismissed; appellant bears revision costs
BAG 10 AZR 64/14Bag / Division 10Dec 10, 2014Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian State Labour Court judgment. The decision contains no statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them under § 313a ZPO. The only operative consequence stated is that the plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
§ 313a ZPO; where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons, the appellate court may issue a shortened judgment. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-12-10
Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 64/14
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 27. September 2012, Az: 19 Ca 299/12, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 15. November 2013, Az: 14 Sa 1620/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 10. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 15. November 2013 - 14 Sa 1620/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf die Darstellung von Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründen verzichtet.
| Linck | Brune | W. Reinfelder | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiel | Schumann |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian State Labour Court judgment was admissible and well-founded
The revision was unsuccessful and was rejected.
The court saw no basis to alter the appellate judgment; the parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO.
Allocation of revision costs
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, the plaintiff bears the costs of the proceedings at this stage.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.