BAG 4 AZR 224/13•Revision dismissed in parallel tariff case
BAG 4 AZR 224/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht's judgment. The decision was rendered in a parallel-case context in which the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons. The only dispositive points were dismissal of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the claimant.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons in a parallel case, the court may issue a shortened judgment form. In the absence of a successful revision, the Federal Labour Court dismisses the appeal and allocates the costs to the unsuccessful appellant. The disposition concerns only the operative part; no further reasons are recorded where the statutory prerequisites for a reasonless judgment are met.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 224/13
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 237/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 388/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 388/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Creutzfeldt | Treber | Spinner | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schuldt | Kriegelsteiner |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the LAG judgment should be allowed.
The revision was unsuccessful and the lower-court judgment remained in force.
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the revision; the decision was issued without factual findings and reasons due to the parties' waiver in light of the parallel proceeding.
Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.
The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, the claimant was ordered to bear the appellate costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.