Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 231/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The parties had agreed to waive the statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel proceeding, 4 AZR 50/13. The court therefore issued a short judgment and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; revision dismissed by summary judgment with waiver of findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the appellate court may render a shortened judgment pursuant to the cited provisions. The operative part remains limited to the disposition of the revision and the allocation of costs; no further abstract reasoning is set out in the decision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 231/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 231/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 207/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 424/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 424/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision without setting out separate reasons because the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, costs were imposed on the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.