Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 229/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The court noted that, because of the parallel proceeding 4 AZR 50/13, the parties waived the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in parallel proceedings: Where the parties, in view of a parallel case, waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision without a full written reasoning. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 229/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 229/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 167/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 393/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 393/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Labour Court judgment was admissible and well-founded.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision without further reasoning, noting the parties' waiver of factual findings and reasons in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.