Revision in labor dispute dismissed

BAG 4 AZR 236/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this labor-law revision, the Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's appeal against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The parties had waived statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The only operative rulings are the dismissal of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the claimant.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; revision dismissed and costs allocated to the unsuccessful appellant. Where the parties waive facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the judgment may be rendered without a full statement of facts and reasons if the statutory prerequisites are met. The dismissal of the revision leaves the challenged appellate judgment in force; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 236/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 236/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 216/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 429/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 429/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostslabor lawwaiver of reasonsparallel proceeding

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the lower-court judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains only the dispositive outcome; the parties waived facts and reasons under the procedural provisions cited in the headnote.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the claimant was ordered to bear the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.