Revision dismissed in labor case

BAG 4 AZR 226/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the Hessian LAG judgment in case 17 Sa 390/12. The panel stated that, in view of the parallel case 4 AZR 50/13, the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons under the cited procedural provisions. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in a parallel case permits disposition without written reasons. Where the parties validly dispense with the Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe, the court may decide accordingly; the absence of reasons does not affect the validity of the judgment, and the revision may simply be dismissed with a cost order against the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 226/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 226/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 231/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 390/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 390/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the LAG judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The decision provides no written reasoning because the parties waived findings and reasons in view of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs follow the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.