Revision dismissed in labour law dispute

BAG 4 AZR 221/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The judgment was rendered in the context of a parallel case, and the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case. Where the parties, with reference to a parallel proceeding, waive the statement of facts and the grounds for decision, the Federal Labour Court may confine itself to the dispositive part. A revision dismissed by the Federal Labour Court entails cost liability of the revising party.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 221/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 221/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 166/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 385/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 385/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the decision states only the dispositive outcome and notes that the parties waived factual findings and reasons because of a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the costs were imposed on the plaintiff in the tenor.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.