Revision dismissed in labor law dispute

BAG 4 AZR 230/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The decision was issued in connection with a parallel case, and the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; dismissal of a revision with waiver of statement of facts and reasons. Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive the Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe, the Federal Labour Court may issue a shortened judgment without further reasons; the revision is dismissed if it lacks success on the merits, and costs follow the outcome.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 230/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 230/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 211/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 423/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 423/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiverparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision had no success and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The court followed the result in the parallel proceeding and, pursuant to the parties' waiver under the cited procedural provisions, issued the judgment without facts and reasons.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.